2024 Q2 Market Review

By Schultz Collins Investment Counsel on July 25, 2024

Globally, stocks continued their ascent higher in the second quarter of the year.  Emerging Market stocks outpaced positive returns in U.S. and non-U.S. developed markets were slightly negative for the period. The positive returns in global equities may be linked to easing inflation data while economic data remained generally healthy. This may be contributing to the market’s growing belief that the U.S. Fed may begin easing interest rate policy sometime in the near future.

The aggregate global stock market, as measured by the MSCI All Country World Index, rose 3.01% in the quarter and ended the trailing 12-month period with gains of 19.88%. 

In the U.S. markets, the S&P 500 Index, an index of large company stocks, increased 4.28% for the quarter and 24.50% over the past 12 months.  Small companies in the United States as measured by the Russell 2000 Index, lost 3.28% during the quarter but are higher by 10.03% over the trailing 12-month period. The Dow Jones U.S. Select Real Estate Investment Trust Index, a benchmark for US real estate performance, ended the quarter -0.16%, but gained 7.13% over the previous 12 months. The relative struggles in REIT stocks likely reflect continued concerns over the future prospects of some sectors of commercial real estate and potential future financing hurdles to come.

Stocks in international developed countries, as proxied by the MSCI Europe, Australasia and Far East Index, lost 0.17% for the quarter but remain up 12.07% for the trailing 12 months.

Stocks in emerging market countries, as measured by the MSCI Emerging Markets Stock Index, led the other major global markets increasing by 5.12% for the quarter, and 12.95% over the previous 12 months. 

International and U.S. fixed income prices experienced volatility during the quarter ending with mixed results. As mentioned earlier, concerns about persistent inflation at the beginning of the quarter were abated near the end of the quarter. In the U.S., headline inflation eased to 3.3% in May from 3.4% in April, and inflation slowed to 2.5% in Europe and 2% in the U.K. U.S. bonds, as measured by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, rebounded to end the quarter up 0.07% and 2.63% for the trailing 12-month period.

The global bond market, as measured by the World Government Bond Index, declined 1.58% in the quarter and still lower by 0.63% in the trailing 12-month period.  Intermediate-term corporate bonds in the US, as proxied by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index, rose by 0.74% in the quarter, and 5.88% over the last 12 months.

During the quarter, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note rose to a high of 4.70% but ended the period at 4.36%. The yield is higher than last summer when the 10-year note yielded 3.81%.

Schultz Collins Sequence of Returns Risk Commentary

It’s common for advisors to emphasize that a successful investing strategy involves focusing on returns over the “long-term”, and somewhat ignoring short-term performance. In this context, many advisors consider long term to be 10, 20, or 30 plus year periods, versus 1, 3 or 5 years. However, even if markets produce positive long-term returns, for investors initiating a withdrawal program, short-term market performance can have a major impact on long term portfolio values.

As Chart 1 illustrates, investors not making any contributions or withdrawals, will earn the same average return, regardless of poor performance at the beginning or end of the period.

Chart 1[1]

However, when it comes time to begin a withdrawal strategy, the timing of bad returns becomes more troublesome. Remember, during periods of negative market performance, withdrawal strategies exacerbate poor portfolio performance. In order to return to the original value, the portfolio must work harder to make up for the withdrawals; thus, the order of negative and positive returns can affect the ending value of a portfolio. 

Let’s look at a simple example to illustrate the point. We will examine a hypothetical 3-year period of portfolio returns. The annual returns are -7%, 1% and 20%. The average rate of return is 4.67% and the compound rate of return is 4.07%. Assume we have an investor with a portfolio value of $100 and needs to withdraw $4 at the end of each year, or 4% of the initial value. In our example in Table 1, we see 3 scenarios for a portfolio. Each scenario has the same return series, but in a different order. For example, Scenario A realized the worst return, -7%, in year 1. Scenario B realized the worst return in year 2. Scenario C realized the worst return in year 3.

Table 1[2]

After 3 years, Scenario A has the lowest ending portfolio value. The second lowest value was Scenario B and the highest was Scenario C, which realized the poorest annual performance in year 3. Interesting to note that Scenario C is the only portfolio to realize growth over the 3-year period. The other 2 portfolios ended with less than $100.

In the real world, we cannot control when negative markets occur; therefore, the options available are to control the portfolio’s risk and return characteristics.

There are different strategies investors may adopt to control risk and return. Two of those choices are: defer the start of a withdrawal program, but most investors are not willing to do so. Another option is to consider increasing the portfolio’s diversification. A common solution is to add bonds to a portfolio of stocks.

The historic and expected range of returns of bonds are smaller than stocks; therefore, the addition of bonds to a stock portfolio may reduce swings in its value. Chart 2 shows a simple historical example from the period of 2000 to 2010. Investors may recall this period began with steep negative returns. Here, we are looking at the growth of $100 in the S&P 500 and a portfolio of 60% S&P 500 and 40% U.S. aggregate bond market. We assume $4 are withdrawn every year. The 60/40 portfolio is rebalanced annually. As you can see, the two portfolios realized dramatically different ending values at the end of the decade. The better portfolio performance was the one with 40% fixed income.

Chart 2[3]

Conclusion: We have not covered every means of reducing sequence of returns risk, nor is one method applicable to every investor. This commentary is only an introduction to the sequence of returns risk. We are happy to discuss this subject with you in greater detail. For an advanced examination of this subject, we can refer you to the Sequence of Returns Risk Revisited article, published in the Retirement Management Journal and co-authored by Patrick Collins, Schultz Collins Principal Emeritus. 

As always, if you have questions about this information or any other subjects, please feel free to contact us at 415-291-3000.

Download a copy of the article here.

[1] Data provided by Dimensional Fund Advisors Returns Web App. For illustrative purposes only.

[2] Data provided in the example are hypothetical. For illustrative purposes only.

[3] Data provided by Dimensional Fund Advisors Returns Web App. For illustrative purposes only.

Disclaimer: Schultz Collins is a group comprised of investment professionals registered with Hightower Advisors, LLC, an SEC registered investment adviser. Some investment professionals may also be registered with Hightower Securities, LLC, member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services are offered through Hightower Advisors, LLC. Securities are offered through Hightower Securities, LLC.

This is not an offer to buy or sell securities. No investment process is free of risk, and there is no guarantee that the investment process or the investment opportunities referenced herein will be profitable. Past performance is neither indicative nor a guarantee of future results. The investment opportunities referenced herein may not be suitable for all investors.

All data or other information referenced herein is from sources believed to be reliable. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices, or other data or information contained in this presentation is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. Schultz Collins and Hightower Advisors, LLC or any of its affiliates make no representations or warranties express or implied as to the accuracy or completeness of the information, or for statements or errors or omissions, or results obtained from the use of this information. Schultz Collins and Hightower Advisors, LLC assume no liability for any action made or taken in reliance on or relating in any way to this information. The information is provided as of the date referenced in the document. Such data and other information are subject to change without notice.

This document was created for informational purposes only; the opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s) and do not represent those of Hightower Advisors, LLC, or any of its affiliates.