In this month’s video, we would like to discuss a risk factor many investors will face, it’s called Sequence of Returns Risk.
Schultz Collins Sequence of Returns Risk Commentary
It’s common for advisors to emphasize that a successful investing strategy involves focusing on returns over the “long-term”, and somewhat ignoring short-term performance. In this context, many advisors consider long term to be 10, 20, or 30 plus year periods, versus 1, 3 or 5 years. However, even if markets produce positive long-term returns, for investors initiating a withdrawal program, short-term market performance can have a major impact on long term portfolio values.
As Chart 1 illustrates, investors not making any contributions or withdrawals, will earn the same average return, regardless of poor performance at the beginning or end of the period.
Chart 1
However, when it comes time to begin a withdrawal strategy, the timing of bad returns becomes more troublesome. Remember, during periods of negative market performance, withdrawal strategies exacerbate poor portfolio performance. In order to return to the original value, the portfolio must work harder to make up for the withdrawals; thus, the order of negative and positive returns can affect the ending value of a portfolio.
Let’s look at a simple example to illustrate the point. We will examine a hypothetical 3-year period of portfolio returns. The annual returns are -7%, 1% and 20%. The average rate of return is 4.67% and the compound rate of return is 4.07%. Assume we have an investor with a portfolio value of $100 and needs to withdraw $4 at the end of each year, or 4% of the initial value. In our example in Table 1, we see 3 scenarios for a portfolio. Each scenario has the same return series, but in a different order. For example, Scenario A realized the worst return, -7%, in year 1. Scenario B realized the worst return in year 2. Scenario C realized the worst return in year 3.
Table 1
After 3 years, Scenario A has the lowest ending portfolio value. The second lowest value was Scenario B and the best was Scenario C, which realized the poorest annual performance in year 3. Interesting to note that Scenario C is the only portfolio to realize growth over the 3-year period. The other 2 portfolios ended with less than $100.
In the real world, we cannot control when negative markets occur; therefore, the options available are to control the portfolio’s risk and return characteristics.
There are different strategies investors may adopt to control risk and return. Two of those choices are: defer the start of a withdrawal program, but most investors are not willing to do so. Another option is to consider increasing the portfolio’s diversification. A common solution is to add bonds to a portfolio of stocks.
The historic and expected range of returns of bonds are smaller than stocks; therefore, the addition of bonds to a stock portfolio may reduce swings in its value. Chart 2 shows a simple historical example from the period of 2000 to 2010. Investors may recall this period began with steep negative returns. Here, we are looking at the growth of $100 in the S&P 500 and a portfolio of 60% S&P 500 and 40% U.S. aggregate bond market. We assume $4 are withdrawn every year. The 60/40 portfolio is rebalanced annually. As you can see, the two portfolios realized dramatically different ending values at the end of the decade. The better portfolio performance was the one with 40% fixed income.
Chart 2
Conclusion: We have not covered every means of reducing sequence of returns risk, nor is one method applicable to every investor. This commentary is only an introduction to the sequence of returns risk. We are happy to discuss this subject with you in greater detail. For an advanced examination of this subject, we can refer you to the Sequence of Returns Risk Revisted article, published in the Retirement Management Journal and co-authored by Patrick Collins, Schultz Collins Principal Emeritas.
As always, if you have questions about this information or any other subjects, please feel free to contact us at 415-291-3000.
Download a copy of the article here.
Schultz Collins Investment Counsel is a group comprised of investment professionals registered with Hightower Advisors, LLC, an SEC registered investment adviser. Some investment professionals may also be registered with Hightower Securities, LLC, member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services are offered through Hightower Advisors, LLC. Securities are offered through Hightower Securities, LLC. All information referenced herein is from sources believed to be reliable. Schultz Collins Investment Counsel and Hightower Advisors, LLC have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document. Schultz Collins Investment Counsel and Hightower Advisors, LLC or any of its affiliates make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or for statements or errors or omissions, or results obtained from the use of this information. Schultz Collins Investment Counsel and Hightower Advisors, LLC or any of its affiliates assume no liability for any action made or taken in reliance on or relating in any way to the information. This document and the materials contained herein were created for informational purposes only; the opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s), and do not represent those of Hightower Advisors, LLC or any of its affiliates. Schultz Collins Investment Counsel and Hightower Advisors, LLC or any of its affiliates do not provide tax or legal advice. This material was not intended or written to be used or presented to any entity as tax or legal advice. Clients are urged to consult their tax and/or legal advisor for related questions.
Form Client Relationship Summary ("Form CRS") is a brief summary of the brokerage and advisor services we offer.
HTA Client Relationship Summary
HTS Client Relationship Summary
Hightower Advisors, LLC is a SEC registered investment adviser. brokercheck.finra.org
© 2024 Hightower Advisors. All Rights Reserved.